Login | Register
Kazakh National Agrarian Research University ISSN 2304-3334 (Print)  ·  ISSN 2304-3334 (Online)
submit an article
Menu
submit an article
STOCK-RAISING AND VETERINARY

EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS

Rinat Gadiev 1 , Ainur Davletova 2 , Ruslan Sharipov 3 , Kairly Esengaliev 4 , Aiman Dzhumagaliyeva 5

1 FSBEI HE “Bashkir State Agricultural University,” Republic of Bashkortostan, 450001, Ufa; 2 West Kazakhstan Innovative-Technological Uni versity, Uralsk, 090000, Republic of Kazakhstan; 3 “Union of Poultry Farmers of Kazakhstan”, Poultry Farmers’ Chamber of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan; 4 West Kazakhstan Innovative-Technological University, Uralsk, 090000, Republic of Ka zakhstan; 5 West Kazakhstan Innova tive-Technological University, 194 Nazarbayev Ave., Uralsk, 090000, Republic of Kazakhstan

doi.org/10.37884/1-2026/02 pp. 17-27 Admitted 14.01.2026 Published 27.02.2026

Abstract

This article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the productivity and economic indicators of geese of the Large Lion-Headed, Linda breeds, and their hybrid forms. The aim of this study is to assess the productivity of geese of the Large Lion-Headed and Linda breeds, as well as their hybrids, based on key indicators: live weight, survival rate, fertilization rate, and hatchability. The data obtained will help determine optimal ways to use these genotypes in practical goose breeding to increase production profitabil ity. Scientific studies to assess the productive qualities of geese were carried out under the production con ditions of LLC “Bashkirskaya Ptitsa”, located in the Blagovarsky district of the Republic of Bashkortostan. Since 2019, the enterprise has been conducting breeding work with a unique waterfowl breed — the Large Lion-Headed goose — and has currently reached a breeding stock of over one thousand birds. During the re search, systematic monitoring of key productivity traits was carried out using generally accepted zootechnical methods. Survival rate assessment included daily recording of bird mortality, documentation of forced culling, and monitoring throughout the productive period. Growth dynamics were studied through monthly individual weighing of breeding birds and body weight registration. Reproductive traits were assessed by determining weighing of breeding birds and body weight registration. Reproductive traits were assessed by determining average egg production (eggs per bird) and calculating the egg-laying intensity index (ratio of egg mass to feed consumption). Incubation performance was evaluated using the VNIIP methodology and included fertil ization rate and chick hatchability percentage. The study covers the key aspects of egg and meat productivity, incubation quality, and the economic efficiency of breeding. Special attention is given to the evaluation of pro duction profitability under current market conditions. 

geese, linda breed, hybrid, egg production, egg weight, safety of geese

01 Introduction

The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.

02 References

  1. Akhtar M.F., Shafiq M., Ali I. (2021). Improving gander reproductive efficacy in the context of globally sustainable goose production //Ani mals. Т. 12. №. 1. С. 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010044.
  2. Азаубаева Г.С. (2017). Оценка племенной ценности гусей с использованием показателей естественной резистентности //Вестник Курганской ГСХА. №. 4 (24). С. 10-16. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-plemennoy-tsennosti-gusey-s-ispolzovaniem-pokazateley estestvennoy-rezistentnosti.pdf.
  3. Буяров В.С. (2019). Оценка племенных качеств сельскохозяйственной птицы яичного направления продуктивности (обзор) //Вест ник аграрной науки. №. 4 (79). С. 46-55. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-plemennyh-kachestv-selskohozyaystvennoy-ptitsy-yaichnogo napravleniya-produktivnosti-obzor.
  4. Fisinin V.I. (2017). The creation of high-yield animal and poultry breeds and crosses //Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Т. 87. №. 2. С. 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331617020101.
  5. Гадиев, Р.Р. (2025). Адаптационные качества гусей белой китайской породы в условиях Республики Башкортостан // Вестник Баш кирского государственного аграрного университета. № 1 (73). С. 60–65. DOI 10.31563/1684-7628-2025-73-1-60-65.
  6. Гальперн И.Л., Перинек О.Ю. (2019). Методы создания яично-мясного кросса кур с повышенными показателями качества биотехно логической и пищевой продукции для фермерских и приусадебных хозяйств //Известия Санкт-Петербургского государственного аграр ного университета. №. 4 (57). С. 105-111. DOI 10.24411/2078-1318-2019-14105.
  7. Гильманова Г.Э. (2023). Эффективность использования кормовой добавки «Гепалан» при кормлении взрослых гусей //Journal of Agriculture and Environment. Т. 35. №. 7. https://doi.org/10.23649/JAE.2023.35.4.
  8. Харитонов В.В., Федосова М.С. (2018). ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ ВЫРАЩИВАНИЯ ГУСЕЙ В ПОДСОБНЫХ И ФЕРМЕРСКИХ ХОЗЯЙ СТВАХ //Аграрный вестник Верхневолжья. №. 3. С. 84-90. https://avv-ivgsha.ucoz.ru/vet-3-2018.pdf#page=15.
  9. Хафизова Г., Гадиев Р., Косилов В. (2024). Конверсия корма у гусей родительского стада при использовании в составе их рациона нуклеостима //Вестник Ошского государственного университета. Сельское хозяйство: агрономия, ветеринария и зоотехния. №. 1. С. 143 149. https://doi.org/10.52754/16948696_2024_1(6)_20.
  10. Кашапова Р.А., Гайфуллина А.Р., Гадиев Р.Р., Хазиев Д.Д. (2025). Инкубационные качества яиц гусей родительского стада крупной серой породы при включении в рацион гуминовых веществ // Птица и птицепродукты. № 1. С. 15–18. https://doi.org/10.30975/2073-4999 2025-27-1-15-18.
  11. Kozák, J. (2021). Goose production and goose products / J. Kozák // World’s Poultry Science Journal. Vol. 77. № 2. Pр. 403–414. https://doi. org/10.1080/00439339.2021.1885002.
  12. Khaziev D. et al. (2022). The Influence of Geese Age on Their Productive and Reproductive Qualities //American Journal of Animal and Vet erinary Sciences. Т. 17. №. 1. С. 89-96. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2022.89.96.
  13. Khaziev D. et al. (2023). Egg‐laying capacity of parent flock geese at different stocking densities //Animal Science Journal. 2023. Т. 94. №. 1. С. e13831. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13831.
  14. Машкина Е.И. (2019). Экономические аспекты технологии выращивания гусей в фермерском хозяйстве // Вектор экономики. №. 6. С. 151-156. http://www.vectoreconomy.ru.
  15. Мусин, А.Г., Татлыбаева Е.Б., Гадиев Р.Р. (2025). Факторы, влияющие на содержание витамина Е в рационах сельскохозяйственной птицы // Известия Оренбургского государственного аграрного университета. №. 2 (112). С. 311–317. DOI https://doi.org/10.37670/2073-0853-2025-112-2-311-317.
  16. Мельникова Т.В., Бакирова Г.А., Безрукова А.Н., Ізмұқан А.Ж., Мусина Г.Ш., Джамалов Г.А. (2024). Особенности бактериальной обсемененности патматериала сельскохозяйственных кур // Ізденістер, нәтижелер –Исследования, результаты. №4(104). С. 33-47. ISSN 2304-3334. https://doi.org/10.37884/4-2024/04.
  17. Ройтер Я.С., Соловьев В.Ю. (2024). Оценка и отбор гусей по мясным формам телосложения //Эффективное животноводство. №. 2 (192). С. 48-49. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-i-otbor-gusey-po-myasnym-formam-teloslozheniya.
  18. Panel E.A. et al. (2023). Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm //EFSA journal. Т. 21. №. 5. С. 1-157. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7992
  19. Martsev A. (2020). Origin and exterior features analysis of geese breeds genealogical groups in Russian gene pool herd //E3S Web of Conferences. – EDP Sciences. – Т. 203. – С. 01025. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020301025.
  20. Yan X. et al. (2023). Slaughter performance of the main goose breeds raised commercially in China and nutritional value of the meats of the goose breeds: A systematic review //Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. Т. 103. №. 8. С. 3748-3760. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12244.
  21. Yin L.Y. et al. (2017). Effects of stocking density on growth performance, feather growth, intestinal development, and serum parameters of geese //Poultry science. Т. 96. №. 9. С. 3163-3168. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex136.
  22. Huang J. et al. (2023). Effect of crossbreeding and sex on slaughter performance and meat quality in Xingguo gray goose based on multiomics data analysis //Poultry Science. Т. 102. №. 8. С. 102753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102753.

Citation Links

[1]2026. EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS. Izdenister natigeler. 28, 1(109) (Feb. 2026), 17–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2026/02.
(1)EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS. Izdenister natigeler 2026, 28 (1(109), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2026/02.
EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS. (2026). Izdenister Natigeler, 28(1(109), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2026/02
EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS. Izdenister natigeler, [S. l.], v. 28, n. 1(109), p. 17–27, 2026. DOI: 10.37884/1-2026/02. Disponível em: https://agrosoil.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/1209. Acesso em: 15 sep. 2026.
“EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS”. 2026. Izdenister Natigeler 28 (1(109): 17-27. https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2026/02.
“EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS” (2026) Izdenister natigeler, 28(1(109), pp. 17–27. doi:10.37884/1-2026/02.
[1]“EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS”, Izdenister natigeler, vol. 28, no. 1(109), pp. 17–27, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.37884/1-2026/02.
“EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS”. Izdenister Natigeler, vol. 28, no. 1(109), Feb. 2026, pp. 17-27, https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2026/02.
“EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS”. Izdenister natigeler 28, no. 1(109) (February 27, 2026): 17–27. Accessed September 15, 2026. https://agrosoil.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/1209.
1.EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS. Izdenister natigeler [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 27 [cited 2026 Sep. 15];28(1(109):17-2. Available from: https://agrosoil.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/1209
1.EVALUATION OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF GEESE OF THE LARGE LION-HEADED, LINDA BREEDS AND THEIR HYBRIDS. Izdenister natigeler. 2026;28(1(109):17-27. doi:10.37884/1-2026/02