Abstract
In the context of Kazakhstan’s ongoing digital transformation, the development of geo-portals based on geospatial databases has become a strategic direction for improving the efficiency and transparency of spatial data management. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using geographical databases in the design and implementation of geo-portals and to propose methodological approaches for building a unified geoinformation environment in the country. The research employed platforms such as QGIS, ArcGIS Pro, PostgreSQL/PostGIS, and Leaflet, enabling the integration and visualization of administrative, hydrographic, agricultural, and infrastructural data layers. Emphasis was placed on adherence to open standards (e.g., OGC WMS/WFS, ISO-compliant metadata), role-based access control, and scalable deployment patterns suitable for multi-departmental use. The proposed geo-portal architecture combines data processing, analysis, and visualization workflows, provides near real-time access to spatial information, and incorporates data-quality assurance (topology checks, schema validation), caching, and logging for performance and auditability. Evaluation included interoperability testing with regional and national GIS systems, response-time benchmarking under load, and user acceptance testing with domain experts. The results demonstrate that the application of geodatabases significantly enhances interoperability across platforms, improves discoverability and reuse of authoritative datasets, and contributes to the digital transformation of land management, environmental monitoring, and spatial planning processes in Kazakhstan. The study concludes with practical recommendations on governance, data lifecycle management, and technology stack selection to support sustainable, secure, and extensible geo-portal implementations.
01 Introduction
The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.
02 References
- 1. Rafikov, T., Yerbolkyzy, M., & Zhildikbayeva, A. (2024). Otsenka sostoyaniya rastitel’nosti Vostochno-Kazakhstanskoy oblasti s ispol’zovaniem NDVI. Izdenister, natigeler, 1(101), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2024/18 [in Russian]
- 2. Zhumataeva, Zh., Serikbayeva, G., Turganaliev, S., Mukaliyev, Zh., & Rafikov, T. (2024). Povyshenie ekologo-ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti ispol’zovaniya zemel’nykh resursov. Izdenister, natigeler, 2(102), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/35 [in Russian]
- 3. Sadenova, M., et al. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of remote sensing, GIS, and AI data integration for sustainable agriculture: A case study from Kazakhstan. Sustainable Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00625-4
- 4. Goodchild, M. F., & Li, W. (2021). GIScience and big data: The challenge of spatial data in the era of machine learning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 90, 101687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101687
- 5. Goodchild, M. F. (2019). Geography and geographic information science: An evolving relationship. The Canadian Geographer, 63(4), 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12554
- 6. Haklay, M., & Weber, P. (2008). OpenStreetMap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2008.80
- 7. Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2015). Geographic information science and systems (4th ed.). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Geographic%2BInformation%2BScience%2Band%2BSystems%2C%2B4th%2BEdition-p-9781119128458
- 8. Kraak, M.-J., & Ormeling, F. (2020). Cartography: Visualization of geospatial data (4th ed.). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9780429464195
- 9. Li, S., Dragicevic, S., & Veenendaal, B. (Eds.). (2020). Advances in web-based GIS, mapping services and applications (2nd ed.). CRC Press. https://www.routledge.com/Advances-in-Web-based-GIS-Mapping-Services-and-Applications/Li-Dragicevic-Veenendaal/p/book/9781138117815
- 10. QGIS Development Team. (2025). QGIS geographic information system [Computer software]. QGIS Association. https://www.qgis.org
- 11. Esri. (2023). Best practices for system architecture — ArcGIS Enterprise. Environmental Systems Research Institute. https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/server/11.2/deploy/windows/best-practices-for-system-architecture.htm
- 12. Esri. (2023). Work with services — ArcGIS Enterprise [Documentation]. Environmental Systems Research Institute. https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/server/11.0/install/windows/services-in-arcgis-enterprise.htm
- 13. Craglia, M., & Annoni, A. (2020). Digital Earth vision and spatial data infrastructures: Pathways for integration. International Journal of Digital Earth, 13(8), 950–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2020.1762093
- 14. Abdrakhmanov, T., Serikbayev, K., & Tuleuov, A. (2023). Implementation of GIS technologies for land monitoring in Kazakhstan. Bulletin of KazNARU, 2(94), 77–84. https://kaznaru-bulletin.kz (journal homepage)
- 15. Batyrkhanova, D., & Akhmetova, A. (2022). Development of a national geoportal for open spatial data in Kazakhstan. KazNU Bulletin. Earth Sciences Series, 1(59), 41–50. https://bulletin.enu.kz/ (series homepage)
- 16. Biekša, K. (2016). The evaluation of cereal farms using the ecological footprint method. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 38(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2016.16
- 17. Hurni, L., & Sieber, R. (2023). The evolution of geographic information science: From desktop mapping to cloud-based geoportals. International Journal of Digital Earth, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2172763
- 18. Zhang, C., & Li, W. (2021). Web GIS: Principles and applications. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/ (publisher portal)